March
Tuesday 4 March 2014 photo 2/29
![[EDIT] Laddar upp en ny bild med boobsen cencurerade så att gruppen inte blir random borttagen om någon får för sig att dra en anmälning på den. Så.
Supermodel Karlie Kloss was photoshopped to look less thin for a Numero campaign. There are so many things wrong with this. Models are forced to be incredibly thin to fit a certain aesthetic, but when they do, they’re so emaciated that they have to be photoshopped to not look sick.
Robin Hardy, a former creative director at Vogue, has commented on the practice of photoshopping to cover up the aesthetic and health costs of extreme thinness:
“At the time, when we pored over the raw images, creating the appearance of smooth flesh over protruding ribs, softening the look of collarbones that stuck out like coat hangers, adding curves to flat bottoms and cleavage to pigeon chests, we felt we were doing the right thing…
But now, I wonder. Because for all our retouching, it was still clear to the reader that these women were very, very thin. But, hey, they still looked great!
They had 22-inch waists (those were never made bigger), but they also had breasts and great skin. They had teeny tiny ankles and thin thighs, but they still had luscious hair and full cheeks.
Thanks to retouching, our readers… never saw the horrible, hungry downside of skinny. That these underweight girls didn’t look glamorous in the flesh. Their skeletal bodies, dull, thinning hair, spots and dark circles under their eyes were magicked away by technology, leaving only the allure of coltish limbs and Bambi eyes."](http://cdn08.dayviews.com/112/_u3/_u2/_u2/_u9/_u4/_u7/u3229477/fs_517519139_78699_1393920887/_EDIT_Laddar_upp_en_ny_bild_med_boobsen_cencurerade_sa_att_gruppen_inte_blir_random_borttagen_om.jpg)
|
Change
[EDIT] Laddar upp en ny bild med boobsen cencurerade så att gruppen inte blir random borttagen om någon får för sig att dra en anmälning på den. Så.
Supermodel Karlie Kloss was photoshopped to look less thin for a Numero campaign. There are so many things wrong with this. Models are forced to be incredibly thin to fit a certain aesthetic, but when they do, they’re so emaciated that they have to be photoshopped to not look sick.
Robin Hardy, a former creative director at Vogue, has commented on the practice of photoshopping to cover up the aesthetic and health costs of extreme thinness:
“At the time, when we pored over the raw images, creating the appearance of smooth flesh over protruding ribs, softening the look of collarbones that stuck out like coat hangers, adding curves to flat bottoms and cleavage to pigeon chests, we felt we were doing the right thing…
But now, I wonder. Because for all our retouching, it was still clear to the reader that these women were very, very thin. But, hey, they still looked great!
They had 22-inch waists (those were never made bigger), but they also had breasts and great skin. They had teeny tiny ankles and thin thighs, but they still had luscious hair and full cheeks.
Thanks to retouching, our readers… never saw the horrible, hungry downside of skinny. That these underweight girls didn’t look glamorous in the flesh. Their skeletal bodies, dull, thinning hair, spots and dark circles under their eyes were magicked away by technology, leaving only the allure of coltish limbs and Bambi eyes."
Annons
Anonymous
Sat 15 Mar 2014 16:33
yeah, läste om detta och tyo började grina bc dem feels :(
sserenades
Tue 4 Mar 2014 09:21
Sorgligt. VARFÖR inte bara mindre sjukligt smala modeller? Sparar en jävla massa pengar då retuschering är dyrt dessutom...
Anonymous
Tue 4 Mar 2014 13:28
Överlåt retuscheringen till mig så blir det inte så jävla dyrt. Kanske snarare blir klippa och klistra med Schwarzenegger-bilder, men vem fan bryr sig?
RadioaCtiv3
Tue 4 Mar 2014 15:36
Jag känner mig rätt säker på att oavsett hur modellerna skulle se ut skulle de retucheras.
18 comments on this photo
Directlink:
http://dayviews.com/pictureoftheday/517519139/
Visa toppen
Show footer