read?file=allahabad+high+court+judgement+on+gratuity+guidelines << (Read Online)

interest on delayed payment of pensionary benefits

latest supreme court judgement on gratuity payment

supreme court judgement on new pension scheme

high court lucknow

supreme court judgement on retirement benefits

allahabad high court judgement order

supreme court judgement on pension and gratuity 2017

latest supreme court judgements on pension matters

11 Jul 2016 "(i) Whether the period of training of the applicant has to be counted for the purpose of calculation of gratuity under the Act. (ii) Whether adhoc payment made under the interim directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Transfer Application No.8 of 2000, which was subsequently dismissed by the Hon'ble
1985, would not be applicable.9. there is no denial that the employees are entitled to gratuity under the payment of gratuity act, 1972. there is also no denial that the assistant labour commissioner was the controlling authority for .. had been filed before the allahabad high court and in all those cases concerning workmen
Allahabad High Court. - Cites 31 A Division Bench of this Court, by judgment and order dated entitled to the benefit of gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act , 1972. He filed a writ petition before this Court seeking benefit of the payment of gratuity under the Uttar Pradesh Factories Welfare Officers' Rules, 19553.
12 May 2016 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 4. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 21620 of 2016. Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Mall Respondent :- State Of The grievance of the petitioner is that the Department has released his gratuity amount after a considerable delay on 24th July, 2011 whereas he
8 Sep 2016 The Allahabad High Court in Ramsiya Yadav vs. State of UP, has held that gratuity can be withheld in a case where judicial proceedings are pending on the serious charges against employee. Dismissing the challenge against the order passed by the Superintendent of Police who had withheld the gratuity
16 Mar 2016 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 7. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11341 of 2016. Petitioner :- Anand Priya Gautam Respondent :- State I, therefore, direct that henceforth Rules 906 to 960 of the Civil Service Regulations be followed strictly by all concerned officials, and payment of
13 Mar 2013 Full text of the Supreme Court Judgment:Allahabad Bank Vs. A.C. Aggarwal. In our considered opinion, pensionary benefits or the retirement benefits as the case may be whether governed by a scheme or rules may be a package consisting of payment of pension and as well as gratuity. Pensionary
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH Court No. - 1. Case :- SERVICE BENCH No. - 1517 of 2001. Petitioner :- Sewak Saran it was not possible to process his pension papers at an early date, for any reason, whatsoever, then provisional pension and gratuity be paid to him as per the rules.

Annons

The photo has no tags

March 2018