August
Tuesday 18 September 2018 photo 3/8
|
Waterworld 720p
-----------------------------------------
DOWNLOAD: http://urllio.com/qzmtd
-----------------------------------------
Sometime in the future, the polar ice caps have melted and the world's oceans and seas have covered the land. People are few and far between, living in small communities at sea or sailing from one to another as traders. All the people seek dry land.. something nobody has seen.
In a future where the polar ice-caps have melted and Earth is almost entirely submerged, a mutated mariner fights starvation and outlaw "smokers," and reluctantly helps a woman and a young girl try to find dry land.
While i find Kevin Costner to be one of the most over-rated actors and directors of his generation, i actually find this movie to be underrated. That, on the other hand, has nothing to do with Costners performance.
Many people describe this as a "Mad Max on water". I can agree with that description. The same black sense of humor and scrap-yard props can be found here. I enjoyed the first two Mad Max-movies (especially "The Road Warrior") quite a lot, and maybe that's why i get a soft spot for this movie as well. Granted, this is no masterpiece and i still hold "The Road Warrior" a better movie, but as a Mad Max substitute this works.
There was a lot of discussion surrounding this movie when it first came out. Most of it was about economics. The movie became catastrophically expensive before everything was said and done, and the ratings at the box-office were a great disappointment. But i felt too much focus was directed at this instead of at the movie itself. This is not too shabby actually. Costner is his usual boring self, but Dennis Hopper seems to enjoy himself immensely as the antagonist. Also most of the movie is well made technically with several nicely filmed action sequences.
So if you can forget about plausibility, forget about studio politics and ignore Kevin Costners wooden acting, this is actually quite enjoyable. The key is to not expect a miracle and rather just sit back for the ride. I rate it 5/10.
Waterworld is a surprisingly good movie. I say surprising' because with all the hype that surrounded this movie before its release, it got blasted by critics who seemed to focus more on the movies budget (it had the largest one for its time) than the actual film itself. Could someone explain to me why critics suddenly become accountants whenever a movie causes a stir in Hollywood because of its budget? I'd really like to know where that comes from. If the movie's good, it's good, if it's bad, it's bad, it doesn't matter what the budget is. Blair Witch Project proved that. Waterworld is filled with some interesting stunts, including a few things that I've never seen in film before. It has some cool ideas, but few that stand up to any real scrutiny. But it's fun sci-fi, with the emphasis on the fiction more than the science part.
Yes, Waterworld is not without its faults, but it is still a decent enough adventure flick. It's been called "Mad Max on water", although it's much less grim than Max. Its story actually more resembles the sequel to Max, The Road Warrior (anyone who has seen it will recognize many of the plot elements). Costner gives the standard Costner performance, which isn't bad if that's what you like (personally, I kinda like him, but at the same time I've never had to work with him). And ya gotta hand it to Hopper, he really throws himself into his villain roles. The guys a riot, I always look forward to him as the nasty one. I wonder if he has as much fun playing the characters more based in reality in the lower-budget, more independent films he's been doing the last few years as opposed to the larger than life bad guys he's played earlier in the nineties (no doubt the catering is better on the big budget action flicks). I guess I just liked the spirit of this movie, enough so to give it a 7/10 stars. You really can't measure a films worth by its budget. The best you can hope for is to be entertained in this type of film, and I think it delivers quite nicely. G'night!
A not-bad futuristic actioner with three or four astounding sequences, an unusual hero, a nifty villain and less mythic and romantic resonance than might be desired.
The movie was heavily cut for the Theatrical Version. Several years later, the American network ABC aired a reconstructed Extended Version that ran more than 43 minutes longer than the original theatrical version, featuring scenes that were cut prior to the movie's theatrical release. Later on this version was released on DVD as well. In short... no.
Much of the melting would make no difference at all to sea levels. This is because a lot of the ice in the arctic and antarctic is sea ice (ice floats and the icebergs are floating on water). Most of this is already below the waterline - and the only reason a small percentage of an iceberg sticks out of the water is that ice is a bit less dense than water. As it melted the berg would submerge completely, but the ice would also shrink by the same amount as it turned back into water. So the overall effect on the oceans would be zero, or at least very close to it.
What would matter is the ice that is on land melting and that extra water running into the oceans. We don't have a perfect number for how much of this ice there is, but we do know it is reasonably close, and if all the ice on land melted it would raise sea levels by around 400 feet.
Given that most of the world's population lives within 400 feet of sea level this would certainly be a global catastrophe of unprecedented scale. But it would cover only a small fraction of the total surface. It is shown in a deleted scene that the Dry land they find at the end of the film is the top thousand feet or so of Mount Everest, which would indeed be the last place to flood if the ocean could rise that far. But in reality, a 400 foot sea level rise would leave the world with almost as much dry land as it has today, in percentage terms.
To give an example of how far the movie is from reality, consider that it shows the Mariner diving thousands of feet down to explore the sunken city of Denver. In reality a 400 foot sea level rise would leave Denver still almost a mile above sea level, and more than 1,000 miles inland from the coast. a5c7b9f00b
https://disqus.com/home/discussion/channel-callfarlomecpirt/tamil_movie_dubbed_in_hindi_free_download_fate/ https://disqus.com/home/discussion/channel-trantiocenriafreed/broken_horses_full_movie_in_hindi_download/ http://www.naminukai.org/en/news/view/id/262582 https://www.causes.com/posts/4928298 https://www.causes.com/posts/4928295 http://wietijustlink.guildwork.com/forum/threads/5ba09c7a002aa82e0f4dee72-astro-malayalam-movie-download https://pastebin.com/6ZVB8fjA http://bsetecdemo.com/giving/m/feedback/view/Brothers-In-Arms-Download-Torrent http://enbesilkva.blogviajes.com/1537252462/ http://piewancuremi.simplesite.com/433977313/6625209/posting/sahara-full-movie-in-hindi-1080p-download
Annons
Visa toppen
Show footer