psychological “culture" in which the evaluator practices. Many states have specific rules or guidelines about child custody evaluations, such as California Rule of Court 1257.3,
16 Sep 2017 Dianna Gould-Saltman, Los Angeles, CA. John Moran, PhD, Phoenix, AZ. Louise T. Truax, Esq., Lax & Truax, LLC, Southport, CT. 2. Assessment of Intimate Partner Violence in Child Custody. Evaluations: Using the AFCC Guidelines (legal and mental health). Family court practitioners handling child
The Guidelines for Brief Focused. Assessment described herein delineate best practices for BFAs in terms of referrals, methodology, and reporting to the court. They rely heavily on the AFCC Model Standards of Practice for Child Custody. Evaluation2 (CCEs) promulgated by the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts
The acceptance and thus the overall utility of psychologists' child custody evaluations are augmented by demonstrably competent forensic practice and by consistent adherence to codified ethical standards. These guidelines are informed by the American Psychological Association's (APA's) "Ethical Principles of
The following guidelines were developed for psychologists conducting child custody evaluation, specifically within the context of parental divorce. These guidelines build upon the American Psychological Association's Ethical Principles of. Psychologists and Code of Conduct ( APA, 1992 ) and are aspirational in intent.
2012 California Rules of Court. Rule 5.220. Court-ordered child custody evaluations. (a) Authority. This rule of court is adopted under Family. Code sections 211 and 3117. (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007.) 5.220. (b) Purpose. Courts order child custody evaluations, investigations, and assessments to assist

Annons

The photo has no tags

February 2018