2003. Page 3 of 73. 1. PREFACE. 1.1 Introduction. • This book is not a revision of the lectures. The preface (of 21 pages) describes the genesis and background of the leading ideas of the monograph, and discusses a few common
Naming & Necessity Lectures I and II: Reference and Descriptions. PY4617 – The Philosophy of Saul Kripke – Week Two. Theories of reference-fixing vs theories of meaning. • Frege thought names referred to objects, but also thought that names had descriptive “senses". Descriptions do two things in that theory: ? Express
Originally I had intended to revise or augment Naming and. Necessity extensively. Considerable time has elapsed, and I have come to realize that any extensive revision or expansion would delay the appearance of a separate, less expensive edition of. Naming and Necessity indefmitely. Further, as far as revision is.
In particular, both thought that there was no fundamental difference between ordinary proper names and definite descriptions. Russell explicitly claimed that the meanings of proper names were equivalent to the meanings of descriptions associated with those names by speakers, and Frege consistently uses definite
Saul A. Kripke's Naming and Necessity was first published in . A revised and enlarged edition appeared in and has been continually available in print since then. The book is essentially a transcription of three lectures delivered in January at Princeton. University, with some amendments and a preface added. This text will
Kripke Naming and Necessity.pdf - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free.
20 Oct 2008 Kripke: “Naming and Necessity". A RETURN TO MILL. Kripke proposes a Millian theory of names, according to which proper names don't have senses. He claims there is an inherent problem in the Fregean notion of sense. A CONFLATION IN FREGE'S NOTION OF SENSE. Kripke's response to Fregean

Annons

The photo has no tags

February 2018