August
Tuesday 18 September 2018 photo 7/7
|
Download The Superman II Full Movie Tamil Dubbed In Torrent-----------------------------------------DOWNLOAD: http://urllio.com/r2sfu -----------------------------------------This time, the Man of Steel has his hands full with a trio of super-powered villains ,General Zod (Terence Stamp), Ursa, (Sarah Douglas), and Non (Jack O'Halloran) who escape from their Phantom Zone prison (remember the weird flying diamond-shaped mirror that scooped them up from the planet Krypton?) and land on Earth, where all three have powers to rival Superman's own. How does it all come out? With a fabulous duel above the streets of Metropolis, and a startling plot twist that neatly ties in Superman's explosive past. Arch-criminal Lex Luthor (Gene Hackman) plays both ends gleefully against the middle in hopes of a modest reward: Australia.Picking up where "Superman: The Movie" left off, three criminals, General Zod (Terence Stamp), Ursa, (Sarah Douglas), and Non (Jack O'Halloran) from the planet Krypton are released from the Phantom Zone by a nuclear explosion in space. They descend upon Earth where they could finally rule. Superman, meanwhile, is in love with Lois Lane (Margot Kidder), who finds out who he really is. Lex Luthor (Gene Hackman) escapes from prison and is determined to destroy Superman by joining forces with the three criminals.Superman 2 can be considered a true sequel to the original (while the other 2 1980s sequels cannot). It is reported that director Richard Donner began to shoot Superman 2 when he was replaced mid-way through with Richard Lester (whose directing was okay for this, but appalling for Superman 3 because of his over-emphasis on slapstick). However, at least in this film, the script is still very strong and great villains which are only seen for a few minutes in the first film make a great appearance - especially Terence Stamp as General Zod. And since I am a film music aficionado, I want to mention that the music itself was basically the first Superman score, with composer Ken Thorne basically reusing John Williams' music from the aforementioned first film. A still strong 8 out of 10.I saw SUPERMAN II when it premiered, back in the summer of 1981. I was just 13 years old and remember to fully enjoy the picture. However, as years passed by and having seen the film yesterday, my feelings for the film have changed somewhat. Firstly, there is a serious drop in quality compared to the original, SUPERMAN, THE MOVIE, which I think still holds up rather well in this day and age of CGI wizardry. There's a sheen of "cheapness" stamped all over the frames of SUPERMAN II; the film itself lacks the lively colors and stunning cinematography of the first one. From the watered down music score (which uses the most familiar material composed by John Williams, but sounds like its being performed by a Junior High band!), to the useless comic relief, to the mostly garage-sale special effects, this sequel could have been so much more. The story itself sounds very interesting: Superman decides to dedicate his life to his true love, Lois Lane, and give up his powers. Yet, at the very same time, the three villains Superman's dad imprisoned back in Krypton escape from the phantom zone and plan to take over the Earth. The situation puts Superman in an awkward position: should he stay with the love of his life or should he save the world from its greatest menace yet. I must admit, the core of the story is really good, and because it is so good it infuriates me even more to see such potential rendered as a half baked sequel. And what ever happened to Lois Lane! She looks dreadful is most of her scenes. She looks like she's suffering from anorexia or something like that. Only on one scene does she look well groomed and pretty (the diner fight scene). And we never really know just "HOW" Superman regained all his super powers after supposedly losing them for good(after all, his mother tells him that, in order to live life with an earth girl, he must dispose of his super powers). Superman appears later on fighting the bad guys as if nothing had happened. Sure, this kind of "script freedom" was similar to the "turning earth backwards" ploy used in the first film. Using this type of "creative device" again only adds insult to injury.
All in all, SUPERMAN II is not all that bad. The actions sequences are rather OK and overall, the film is still fun to watch (despite some very cheapo looking effects). But SUPERMAN II's biggest asset is that it was the basis for the much more superior SUPERMAN RETURNS, in which Brian Singer effectively links his movie to the events of SUPERMAN II, and the only way to TRULY enjoy SUPERMAN RETURNS is to revisit SUPERMAN II.
I haven't seen Richard Donner's cut. My guess is that it's a case of of "too little, too late", since Richard Lester's cut IS the definitive SUPERMAN II sequel (I'm sure if Donner had done it, it would've been immensely superior... too bad he didn't have it his way). Despite all its flaws, SUPERMAN II is (along with SUPERMAN RETURNS) the best sequel the original movie has.Poking fun at its American mythos, but never descending into camp comedy, this sequel makes for a wonderful time.Not exactly. The cellophane "S" logo and the multiple holographic projections were traps Superman had prepared for the villains. This is confirmed by a line from the shooting script: "Zod begins to realize that Superman, on his home turf, has powers and devices at his command beyond their comprehension."
As for the villains, the lasers they shoot were intended as heat vision, while their "disappearing" power was not teleportation but super-speed. Although it was written as such in the script, these powers were not accurately depicted on screen.
Yes, but it was rarely used and later dropped. While not specifically stated, it is implied that he drained the power of the green crystal to restore his powers. In the screenplay, and as originally filmed, Jor-El used the remainder of his life force (from that crystal) to give his abilities once again. This was finally shown in the 2006 "Donner Cut". A comparison between the Theatrical Version and the Richard Donner Cut is more than difficult, as both version are very different from each other. Not only the usual additional scenes were added, it is almost a completely new movie. Parts of the story are shown at completely different points in time, other sequences were completely removed and some new sequences were added. In total the Donner Cut is approx. 11 minutes shorter than the Theatrical Version. Due to the humanisation process being spread out all over the vast interior of the Fortress of Solitude, rather than heavily concentrated into one small chamber as it was for Superman himself, it is feasible to conclude that the pain inflicted would be far less noticeable to them. a5c7b9f00b https://www.causes.com/posts/4969720 http://telegra.ph/The-Hacker-Movie-Download-Hd-09-18 https://www.causes.com/posts/4969721 https://pastebin.com/DG27xW5D https://www.causes.com/posts/4969725 http://www.nookl.com/article/337088/tequila-and-bonetti-full-movie-in-hindi-free-download https://www.causes.com/posts/4969714 https://www.causes.com/posts/4969724 https://www.causes.com/posts/4969722 http://telegra.ph/Grand-Theft-Auto-San-Andreas-The-Introduction-Online-Free-09-18
Annons
Visa toppen
Show footer