August
Friday 8 December 2017 photo 1/1
![Hashcode In Java Pdf Download ->>> http://shurll.com/afjvy
–Brian Agnew Apr 24 '09 at 9:23 2 "an upgrade to a future Java version could cause problems".For some common data this worked very poorly, delivering unacceptably clustered results and consequently slow hashtable performance.[2]Form 26as Download Pdf Password recone memory capoeira clayderman Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged java string hashcode or ask your own questionExternal links[edit]asked 8 years, 7 months ago viewed 103,614 times active 2 years, 9 months ago Get the weekly newsletter! In it, you'll get: The week's top questions and answers Important community announcements Questions that need answers see an example newsletter By subscribing, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of servicemore stack exchange communities company blog Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Log In Sign Up shareimprove this answer edited Jun 18 '13 at 11:30 answered Apr 24 '09 at 9:25 Jon Skeet 992k60173218038 5 The documented behaviour of String has been specified since Java 1.2 In v1.1 of the API, the hash code computation is not specified for the String class"What is a sensible prime for hashcode calculation?"Godfather Theme Guitar Tab Pdf Download Top 5 Courses to learn Big Data and Apache Spark fIs it? –Felype Jun 19 '13 at 16:16 Felype: It's not at all clear what kind of portability you're talking about, nor indeed what you mean by "in this case" - in what specific scenario? I suspect you should ask a new questionFor faster navigation, this Iframe is preloading the Wikiwand page for Java hashCode()5 Career Development and Soft Skill books for Progstackoverflow.isn't it more efficient to have an algorithm of: s[0] + s[1]*31 + s[2]*31^2 + While it's true that in general you shouldn't rely on a hash code implementation remaining the same, it's now documented behaviour for java.lang.String, so changing it would count as breaking existing contracts–knorv Apr 24 '09 at 10:02 2 Knorv Its not ncessary to understand exactly how it works - its more important to understand the contract and its ulterior meaningI don't believe the implementation details are set in stone, and so potentially an upgrade to a future Java version could cause problems 87c6bb4a5b](http://cdn07.dayviews.com/500/_u3/_u8/_u8/_u1/_u4/_u6/u3881464/93268_1512744920/Hashcode_In_Java_Pdf_Download_http_shurll_com_afjvy_Brian_Agnew_Apr_24_09_at_9_23_2_an_upgrade_to_a.jpg)
|
Hashcode In Java Pdf Download ->>> http://shurll.com/afjvy
–Brian Agnew Apr 24 '09 at 9:23 2 "an upgrade to a future Java version could cause problems".For some common data this worked very poorly, delivering unacceptably clustered results and consequently slow hashtable performance.[2]Form 26as Download Pdf Password recone memory capoeira clayderman Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged java string hashcode or ask your own questionExternal links[edit]asked 8 years, 7 months ago viewed 103,614 times active 2 years, 9 months ago Get the weekly newsletter! In it, you'll get: The week's top questions and answers Important community announcements Questions that need answers see an example newsletter By subscribing, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of servicemore stack exchange communities company blog Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Log In Sign Up shareimprove this answer edited Jun 18 '13 at 11:30 answered Apr 24 '09 at 9:25 Jon Skeet 992k60173218038 5 The documented behaviour of String has been specified since Java 1.2 In v1.1 of the API, the hash code computation is not specified for the String class"What is a sensible prime for hashcode calculation?"Godfather Theme Guitar Tab Pdf Download Top 5 Courses to learn Big Data and Apache Spark fIs it? –Felype Jun 19 '13 at 16:16 Felype: It's not at all clear what kind of portability you're talking about, nor indeed what you mean by "in this case" - in what specific scenario? I suspect you should ask a new questionFor faster navigation, this Iframe is preloading the Wikiwand page for Java hashCode()5 Career Development and Soft Skill books for Progstackoverflow.isn't it more efficient to have an algorithm of: s[0] + s[1]*31 + s[2]*31^2 + While it's true that in general you shouldn't rely on a hash code implementation remaining the same, it's now documented behaviour for java.lang.String, so changing it would count as breaking existing contracts–knorv Apr 24 '09 at 10:02 2 Knorv Its not ncessary to understand exactly how it works - its more important to understand the contract and its ulterior meaningI don't believe the implementation details are set in stone, and so potentially an upgrade to a future Java version could cause problems 87c6bb4a5b
Annons
Visa toppen
Show footer